Если почитать форум, то большинство сходится во мнении, что разные заводы - разные релизы. Обычно ссылаются на это правило:
1.4.1. Discogs allows the entering of all versions of a release, such as white labels, reissues, different artwork, format variations, colored vinyl, different manufacturers etc. In order for these to be accepted, you must provide enough information to distinguish the different versions of a release. It may be important to provide as much information as possible for major label releases, such as barcodes, matrix numbers, publishing/copyright dates, and any other identifiable marks. Note that different matrix numbers or barcodes may not necessarily mean that a separate release should be entered, please ask in the forum if in doubt.
А вот если один завод выпускает, то разные матрицы как разные релизы не рассматриваются:
1.4.4. Manufacturing variations should not be counted as a unique release. For example:
Different stampers / matrix numbers for the same edition Manufacturing tolerance based variations in the shades of label paper or ink color Mislabelings such as: (correct) labels misapplied to incorrect sides, two of the same labels, or missing labels Unintended vinyl coloration caused by variation in vinyl stock, etc.
Но, есть исключения и из этого правила:
5.4. [.....] One edition of a release may have many different matrix numbers on individual copies - especially for major label releases. These are considered manufacturing variations for the purposes of cataloguing on Discogs, and not unique releases, so one Discogs 'release' may contain multiple variations in matrix numbers etc. For smaller releases, or in special cases, the matrix variation may indicate a unique release / edition, so please ask in the Database Forum Topic if in doubt. [...]
|